A New York Times article posted last week brought up an interesting topic – antique incandescent lamps, the old Edison style filaments, being used in restaurants and other places. The article brought up some interesting points, and had lots of interesting comments from people like Noah Horowitz, Ken Friedman, and Charlie Palmer. Check out this comment from Noah Horowitz, from the article:
“It boggles the mind that in these times of economic hardship and interest in environmental sustainability that restaurant owners would choose the light bulb that uses 5 to 10 times more power than the other bulbs on the market,” Noah Horowitz, a senior scientist at the environmental group, wrote in an e-mail message. “You can’t on the one hand brag how green you are by serving organic beer and locally grown produce while you are lighting your business with the least efficient light bulbs available in the world.”
You know the lamp they’re talking about? The Edison filament?
I’m a huge supporter of energy advocacy. HUGE. I love LEDs, period. I do hate CFLs, mostly because they look like total crap and are filled with Mercury. I love solar power, wind power, and other forms of sustainable energy production. I am always looking for new ways to help the LED industry grow in tune with my industry, lighting design. In the future, I see LED sources becoming the next light source in mass usage, and eventually they’ll be as cheap as incandescent lamps are now.
What really gets me kinda frustrated at critics of incandescent lamps is that most of them aren’t lighting designers, but since everyone else likes to bash incandescent lamps, critics hop on the blame game of incandescent lamps just because they won’t find much opposition. Incandescent lamp critics, do you just feel good to criticize because most people will agree with you? It’s true that it’s not an efficient source – but how many are you still using in your houses, where no one can see what you do on your own time?
Yeah. That’s what I thought.
In the case of these old Edison-style filaments, I think that if critics knew what exactly they were criticizing and WHY designers are using these old inefficient lamps, the critics might have more of an understanding of what they’re criticizing. In this case, I view this subject like iceberg lettuce – sure it has about no nutritional value, but lordy, people love it. Why? Well, it’s cheap, it has its place, and, well, it’s cheap. In the case again of these Edison lamps, lighting designers are using them to get an atmosphere that most LEDs cannot recreate, and certainly not by a fluorescent lamp. Charlie Palmer said that these old incandescent Edison lamps are twenty years ago, and Ken Friedman said “no exposed bulbs!” Well, why? Is it because you’re worried about energy consumption? Is it because you’re worried about people commenting on energy consumption? That doesn’t really seem like a good reason to me to criticize something that you just might not understand.
Now before you call me a troglodyte or some other important people word that you feel better using in order to insult a critic of critics, as a lighting designer, I have a problem being told that incandescent lamps have to be banned. What that says to me is that you don’t think that lighting designers can effectively utilize the light from incandescent lamps, so you have to go ahead and make people believe that they’re just the worst thing since the electric chair. I just have to simply say “BS.” You can tell me how to do my job when you’re better at it than me.
I have a hard time believing that the best next step for improving our worldwide use of electricity is to ban the incandescent lamp. Before you make huge claims like trashing decorative use of incandescent lamps, you should criticize our nation’s electrical grid, the development of Smart Meters, and the fact that energy companies make it nearly fiscally impossible for homeowners to put solar panels on their house in a financially effective way.
The almighty dollar stands in the way of effective and revolutionary changes to the way we light. I think that sucks. Next thing we know, fellow lighting designers, is that we’re not gonna be able to use HPLs, BTNs, FELs, or any other incandescent lamp because people other than lighting designers think they aren’t good for us.